Los Angeles vs San Francisco
Salary & cost of living comparison
Metric
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Median Salary
$68,000
↓
$95,000
↑
Rent (1BR)
$2,600
↓
$3,400
↑
Rent (2BR)
$3,700
↓
$4,800
↑
CoL Index
90
↓
105
↑
Groceries
92
↓
98
↑
Transport
$110
$110
Tax Rate
27%
↓
30%
↑
Tech Hub
8/10
↓
10/10
↑
Cost of Living Ratio
1.17
San Francisco is more expensive
Rent Ratio
1.31
Salary Equivalent Ratio
1.17
💰 Salary Equivalents
Enter your salary to see the equivalent:
$
in Los Angeles
=
—
in San Francisco
Common salary equivalents:
$50k in Los Angeles
=
$59k in San Francisco
$80k in Los Angeles
=
$94k in San Francisco
$100k in Los Angeles
=
$117k in San Francisco
$120k in Los Angeles
=
$140k in San Francisco
$150k in Los Angeles
=
$176k in San Francisco
$200k in Los Angeles
=
$234k in San Francisco
📈 Monthly Budget Breakdown
Los Angeles
$4,366/mo net
Rent $2,600
Groceries $414
Transport $110
Utilities $135
Leisure $225
Savings $882
San Francisco
$5,964/mo net
Rent $3,400
Groceries $441
Transport $110
Utilities $158
Leisure $263
Savings $1,592
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
No, San Francisco is approximately 17% more expensive than Los Angeles based on overall cost of living index.
To maintain the same standard of living as a $100,000 salary in Los Angeles, you would need approximately $117,000 in San Francisco.
Los Angeles has a lower effective tax rate. Los Angeles has an effective rate of 27% while San Francisco has 30%.
San Francisco ranks higher for tech workers with a tech hub score of 10/10 compared to 8/10.