San Francisco vs Los Angeles
Salary & cost of living comparison
Metric
San Francisco
Los Angeles
Median Salary
$95,000
↑
$68,000
↓
Rent (1BR)
$3,400
↑
$2,600
↓
Rent (2BR)
$4,800
↑
$3,700
↓
CoL Index
105
↑
90
↓
Groceries
98
↑
92
↓
Transport
$110
$110
Tax Rate
30%
↑
27%
↓
Tech Hub
10/10
↑
8/10
↓
Cost of Living Ratio
0.86
Los Angeles is cheaper
Rent Ratio
0.76
Salary Equivalent Ratio
0.86
💰 Salary Equivalents
Enter your salary to see the equivalent:
$
in San Francisco
=
—
in Los Angeles
Common salary equivalents:
$50k in San Francisco
=
$43k in Los Angeles
$80k in San Francisco
=
$69k in Los Angeles
$100k in San Francisco
=
$86k in Los Angeles
$120k in San Francisco
=
$103k in Los Angeles
$150k in San Francisco
=
$129k in Los Angeles
$200k in San Francisco
=
$172k in Los Angeles
📈 Monthly Budget Breakdown
San Francisco
$5,964/mo net
Rent $3,400
Groceries $441
Transport $110
Utilities $158
Leisure $263
Savings $1,592
Los Angeles
$4,366/mo net
Rent $2,600
Groceries $414
Transport $110
Utilities $135
Leisure $225
Savings $882
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, Los Angeles is approximately 14% cheaper than San Francisco based on overall cost of living index.
To maintain the same standard of living as a $100,000 salary in San Francisco, you would need approximately $86,000 in Los Angeles.
Los Angeles has a lower effective tax rate. San Francisco has an effective rate of 30% while Los Angeles has 27%.
San Francisco ranks higher for tech workers with a tech hub score of 10/10 compared to 8/10.